[ SECRET POST #3295 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3295 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 058 secrets from Secret Submission Post #471.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: I'm guessing a lot of them

[(Anonymous)]

Do you think there are that many people 18 and under here?

Re: I'm guessing a lot of them

[(Anonymous)]

Happened in 1993-1994

Early 20-somethings were babies or not even born.

Re: I'm guessing a lot of them

[(Anonymous)]

Right, but MJ died only 6 years ago.

If we're going by when the scandalous things happened, well, those people wouldn't even have been born when David Bowie was having sex with this girl. So it makes more sense that she was talking about the death dates.

Re: I'm guessing a lot of them

[chardmonster]

That and it was old news.

I mean unless you expect a bunch of kids in 1999 to be going online to rail about old Michael Jackson news instead of talking about which Backstreet Boy is cutest or complaining about Smashmouth.

Re: I'm guessing a lot of them

[(Anonymous)]

But if teenagers today can rail about old David Bowie news then why can't teenagers of yesteryear rail about old Michael Jackson news?

Re: I'm guessing a lot of them

[(Anonymous)]

Because they didn't care. It was an ancient scandal about some guy their parents liked.

And a lot of people did protest the wave of "but remember pedophilia accusations!!!" in the wake of his death, so.

Re: I'm guessing a lot of them

[(Anonymous)]

"And a lot of people did protest the wave of "but remember pedophilia accusations!!!" in the wake of his death, so."

...yes? That's what I was getting at?

chard was saying teens didn't rail against MJ when he died, because they were too young when he supposedly did the things. But teens DID rail against him when he died, just like teens are railing against Bowie now.

Re: I'm guessing a lot of them

[chardmonster]

How many teenagers do you think are railing about David Bowie?

Re: I'm guessing a lot of them

[(Anonymous)]

A lot, by the looks of it.