[ SECRET POST #3297 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3297 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 030 secrets from Secret Submission Post #471.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Um

[blitzwing]

"people who are not asexual."

Um...and why are you relying on people who are not asexual to define asexuality for you? Because almost every asexual source takes great pains to point out that asexuality is not defined by one's sex drive in any way.

Re: Um

[feotakahari]

Like I said, I don't follow many people who are asexual. I'm just parroting what I read on the Internet.

(Actually, hold up. What sources are you going from? I used to post on AVEN, and they were creepily obsessed with a dichotomy between asexuals, who they framed as having no sex drives, and everyone else, who they assumed must have insatiable, never-ending sex drives. It was honestly kind of fucked up, and it was the main reason I stopped posting there.)

Re: Um

[blitzwing]

Maybe if you don't have a good grasp of the finer points of a minority group's identity, and don't identify as that yourself, you shouldn't go around educating people about them? I mean it doesn't take more than a few minutes to hit google and make sure you're not giving out misinformation.

When did you post on AVEN? Because I've been a member there for a over half a decade now, and for that time they've always had information out about such terms as non-libidinous and such.

Other sources: asexual wikis, pretty much every asexual blogger out there, and erryone on Tumblr. No one except ignorant (and I don't mean that as an insult) non-asexuals defines it as anything other than "doesn't experience sexual attraction".*

*Without getting into the gray stuff anyway

Re: Um

[feotakahari]

I remember I posted on AVEN at some point during high school, which I left in 2010.

As for the rest of this, I don't even know what to say. All I was trying to say is that asexual doesn't mean sex-repulsed. From what the "friendly neighborhood asexual" poster said below, I didn't think I got it that wrong, but if you want me to apologize, I'll do so.

Re: Um

[blitzwing]

That makes sense. I guess things must have changed after that.

You don't have to apologize. It's just sexual attraction, sex drive, and sexual repulsion are three distinct issues. Sex repulsion doesn't necessarily correlate with sex drive.