[ SECRET POST #3303 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3303 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 040 secrets from Secret Submission Post #472.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[hwc]

So you assume I don't use spoiler tags just because I don't get why people get so hung up on them? Sorry to disappoint, I actually use spoiler warnings. They cost me nothing and I consider it a courtesy.

My point is that I think it's ridiculous to expect and demand spoiler warnings for media that came out years ago. No one cries about spoilers in secrets about any of the first six Star Wars movies, even though there are people who haven't seen them yet.

Basically, I see it like this: spoiler warnings are a courtesy, so I add them (even for old stuff). Not throwing a fit when someone accidentally spoils you (especially about old stuff) is also a courtesy, so I don't do it. Could OP have added a spoiler warning? Yes. But conversely, spoiler!anon could have just not thrown a fit; not commenting would have taken nearly zero effort on their part.