case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-01-19 06:58 pm

[ SECRET POST #3303 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3303 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 040 secrets from Secret Submission Post #472.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: above anon

(Anonymous) 2016-01-27 01:28 am (UTC)(link)
I know this is gonna sound harsh, but I think giving up a pet, even if you can't afford their veterinary care, is worse than not getting them the vet care they need.

Like Jesus Christ, would you give your ten-year-old child up for adoption because you couldn't pay their medical bills? Of course not! No one would consider that ethical in any world. So why is it okay to do with a dog who has bonded with you and loves you? How do you know the shelter can even afford the dog's medical care? And you're ripping the dog away from an important emotional bond. That will damage the animal for life.