case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-01-23 03:44 pm

[ SECRET POST #3307 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3307 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 078 secrets from Secret Submission Post #473.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Harrasser found not guilty

(Anonymous) 2016-01-23 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)
"But Elliott's tweets contained nothing of a "violent or sexual nature," and there was no indication he intended to hurt them, Knazan said.

In his tweets, Elliott was largely explaining himself and furthering his views "however offensive or wrong they may be," the judge said, while recognizing the language could be "vulgar and sometimes obscene.""

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/twitter-harassment-trial-verdict-1.3415112

Re: Harrasser found not guilty

(Anonymous) 2016-01-23 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)
So basically someone used vulgar language on the internet while having an argument. ARREST THE TERRIBLE PERSON!

Also, that women looks exactly like I thought she would.

Re: Harrasser found not guilty

(Anonymous) 2016-01-23 11:59 pm (UTC)(link)
It's not vulgar it was violent and threatening.

Re: Harrasser found not guilty

(Anonymous) 2016-01-24 12:07 am (UTC)(link)
It literally says it was not violent.

Re: Harrasser found not guilty

(Anonymous) 2016-01-24 12:10 am (UTC)(link)
It's called cyber violence for a reason.

Re: Harrasser found not guilty

(Anonymous) 2016-01-24 12:17 am (UTC)(link)
"Cyber violence" *laughs*

Man, go tell that to some women in the India who have had acid thrown in their faces. "Yeah, I understand how hard it is to be a woman too. Someone was mean to me on the internet."

Re: Harrasser found not guilty

(Anonymous) 2016-01-24 12:20 am (UTC)(link)
This is a logical fallacy. Just because women have it worse somewhere else does not mean we need to shut up and take it.

Re: Harrasser found not guilty

(Anonymous) 2016-01-24 03:35 am (UTC)(link)
Except that the judge ruled that this was not it.