[ SECRET POST #3311 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3311 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 029 secrets from Secret Submission Post #473.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: "battleground for identity policing and ownership slapfights"

[(Anonymous)]

Build a community around people who don't do that shit (at least not in a toxic way) and you can live your dream

Re: "battleground for identity policing and ownership slapfights"

[(Anonymous)]

Unless it's a closed community where people are vetted it's not gonna happen. It's pretty impossible to have both open or welcoming and free of identity policing now

Re: "battleground for identity policing and ownership slapfights"

[(Anonymous)]

Honestly, I'm not sure how true this is - I feel like most of the major Internet sites now give you a plethora of options to control your engagement and connections.

Re: "battleground for identity policing and ownership slapfights"

[(Anonymous)]

I thought you meant a fan community, not your personal circle of friends?

You can do it with a personal circle easily. Not with a "fandom"

Re: "battleground for identity policing and ownership slapfights"

[(Anonymous)]

You can do it on Twitter or Tumblr as well, I think, if you're willing.

Nah.

[chardmonster]

I mean think about it, a community of people who expressly don't want to discuss this sort of thing is...well it tends to be bigoted. I mean literally bigoted, not "oh nooo you used the wrong word twelve lashes in the justice dungeon."

Re: Nah.

[(Anonymous)]

I take your point but I don't think it necessarily has to be people who don't want to discuss this thing. I think it's more about how you approach the discourse than about your specific views - more a commitment to discussing it in a way that is, you know, nuanced and reasonable and open to difference. And it's been my experience out there that there are people who are not bigots but who are also reasonable and positive and committed to productive conversations.

I mean, I'd be very depressed if there weren't.

Re: Nah.

[chardmonster]

Oh of course! What I'm saying is that it'd be very difficult to build and maintain an online group like that. A friend group? Sure, and other people have said so. But a community like this might be hard to sustain when the morons start showing up.