[ SECRET POST #3311 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3311 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 029 secrets from Secret Submission Post #473.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

They couldn't have been that isolated, he did wind up joining the racist terror gang at 17 @ the latest. which is kinda the ultimate example of bullying I would say. and we know it was through the friends he's shown with in 5th year, Mulciber and Avery. Much of Draco's bullying is in the way he goes around spewing "Mudblood" all the time, I don't see why Snape would be exempt from that same standard -- also, could explain why he always looks the other way when Draco does shit like that even when Draco does it right in front of him.

[diet_poison]

Ok, I kinda feel like this is going to just go in circles, because you're taking the angle that 1. Snape is a douche, which I don't disagree with at all, and that 2. being a douche = bullying, which I do disagree with. This is from my perspective basically becoming a pedantic argument about the definition of "bullying", which I think has to mean a pattern of targeted behavior towards an individual or group intended to humiliate or control. Enabling bullying and expressing racist views are very bad behavior but they're categorically distinct from bullying.

You could argue that Death Eaters as a whole are bullies and I'd agree, but to talk about Snape's role in being a Death Eater bully I'd have to analyze his behavior while he was a Death Eater. I don't think we actually see much of that in the narrative?

I want to be really clear here: while I do think Snape is a nuanced character, I am in no way intending to minimize any of his bad behavior (or to deny that he WAS a bully as a teacher at Hogwarts which he definitely was). My stance has to do with the word "bully" and the fact that I think it's becoming one of those words that's often misused. I want to only use it when it actually applies by definition and not to describe bad behavior in general.

[(Anonymous)]

DA here, and this is sorta late and probably won't be seen, but anyway. I think the word teenage Snape is known to use against other students, "Mudblood", is why his behavior goes beyond just expressing racist views. In the real world, even (most) people who will express racist views know to avoid saying the n-word publicly. It's a word that through historical significance and connotations is meant to oppress. "Mudblood" is intended to fill a similar role in the fictional context of the HP world, and I would absolutely classify that as a pattern of targeted behavior toward a group intended to humiliate, if not control.