case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-01-28 06:53 pm

[ SECRET POST #3312 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3312 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12. http://i.imgur.com/v42amcn.png
[link for anime porn ... type stuff? I'm not even sure what's going on here]















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #473.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2016-01-29 12:13 am (UTC)(link)
But it's not incorrect to say 'cool motive, still murder'. it's entirely correct. and even compatible with a more involved discussion about the motives.

OP

(Anonymous) 2016-01-29 12:18 am (UTC)(link)
It's not "Cool Motive, Still Murder" itself that annoys me - it's that sometimes people do use it to shut down a more nuanced argument. It does have its place, and I do agree that it can be used in more involved discussions about motives.
sarillia: (Default)

[personal profile] sarillia 2016-01-29 12:26 am (UTC)(link)
It's true but it's not always relevant if the person being replied to never actually claimed it wasn't murder and in that case it shows the person who said it isn't really listening.

(Anonymous) 2016-01-29 12:26 am (UTC)(link)
I hate it because it's unnecessary and patronizing. It's like giving a "friendly reminder" that the character is a murderer. Yeah no, we know they're a murderer, that's exactly why we're talking about their motive!

(Anonymous) 2016-01-29 12:29 am (UTC)(link)
I agree. I wouldn't say that phrase if so many people who defended villains tried to argue that they 'didn't actually do x thing"

ex: the Snape argument yesterday with people claiming that the idea that Snape was a bully was just silly tumblr bullshit flavor of the month (When JKR confirmed it herself) or he wasn't THAT bad whereas James picking on Snape was some indicator that he was going to be horrible in EVERY OTHER ASPECT of his life.

Sorry but some people need to be reminded "cool motive, still murder" when they're acting like what their character did was somehow different.
philstar22: (Default)

[personal profile] philstar22 2016-01-29 01:22 am (UTC)(link)
Plenty of people do woobify villains. But some people take the criticism too far and, as the secret talks about, use this phrase to shut down all discussions of villains. There are plenty of fans who know villains are evil but see nuance and want to talk about it. That is not the same as woobifying.