case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-01-30 03:26 pm

[ SECRET POST #3314 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3314 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 072 secrets from Secret Submission Post #474.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: OP

(Anonymous) 2016-01-31 01:42 am (UTC)(link)
You have your underoos in a wad over a doll. Reasonable debate was never a possibility.

Re: OP

(Anonymous) 2016-01-31 01:45 am (UTC)(link)
And once again, you're attacking me based on an assumed strong emotional response that I haven't actually had.

El oh el.

Re: OP

(Anonymous) 2016-01-31 01:48 am (UTC)(link)
Nope, I'm attacking you based on a ridiculous position that you've already admitted is petty. lol.

Re: OP

(Anonymous) 2016-01-31 01:56 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, it is indeed petty. It's also not something I'm especially emotionally invested in, despite your claims to the contrary.

Finding something annoying =/= being angry about it.

It's only a ridiculous position if you are of the opinion that no one should ever entertain petty thoughts.

Re: OP

(Anonymous) 2016-01-31 02:00 am (UTC)(link)
You don't care so much you had to make a secret about it. And then vehemently defend said secret with links to Tumblrina screeds. LMFAO.

It's only a ridiculous position if you are of the opinion that no one should ever entertain petty thoughts.

Or it's ridiculous because it's a stupid thing to get mad over (which you are clearly mad, no matter how much you deny it).

Re: OP

(Anonymous) 2016-01-31 02:09 am (UTC)(link)
I never said I didn't care. Obviously I do care on some level. But caring about something on some level does not necessarily translate to having SUPER STRONG EMOTIONZ OMG about it. Expressing a negative opinion about something and explaining why you have that negative opinion upon being asked is not the same as being super emotionally invested (or "vehement", as you've put it).

So no, I'm not mad. Mildly irritated? Yes. Mad? Nah. But you're free to believe otherwise, if that's what makes you happy. :)

Re: OP

(Anonymous) 2016-01-31 02:12 am (UTC)(link)
Expressing a negative opinion about something and explaining why you have that negative opinion upon being asked is not the same as being super emotionally invested (or "vehement", as you've put it).

I'd say that's the definition of being emotionally invested. If you weren't emotionally ibvested, you wouldn't bother making a secret in the first place, nevermind word-vomiting all over the place about it.

Yeah, you're mad. At a doll. So mad you want it to not exist. And that's fucking funny.

Re: OP

(Anonymous) 2016-01-31 02:23 am (UTC)(link)
"If you weren't emotionally ibvested, you wouldn't bother making a secret in the first place"

Making a secret really doesn't take that much effort. I had an opinion. I posted it to an anonymous forum because I was curious to see how people on said forum would react to said opinion. When asked why I held said opinion, I provided links that supported it. None of that requires any strong emotional investment.

Participating in a pointless internet argument to stave off boredom doesn't require any strong emotional investment either.

"And that's fucking funny."

Not quite as funny as you.

Re: OP

(Anonymous) 2016-01-31 02:25 am (UTC)(link)
None of that requires any strong emotional investment.

Perhaps you're confused by the term "emotional investment" because Tumblr hasn't told you what to think yet?

Re: OP

(Anonymous) 2016-01-31 02:26 am (UTC)(link)
LOL.

Re: OP

(Anonymous) 2016-01-31 02:33 am (UTC)(link)
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

Re: OP

(Anonymous) 2016-01-31 02:43 am (UTC)(link)
looool

Re: OP

(Anonymous) 2016-01-31 02:57 am (UTC)(link)
trololololololololololololo

Re: OP

(Anonymous) 2016-01-31 03:08 am (UTC)(link)
trolololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololol