case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-01-31 03:36 pm

[ SECRET POST #3315 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3315 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01. [tb]


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 060 secrets from Secret Submission Post #474.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2016-01-31 08:58 pm (UTC)(link)
I love it when people who are clearly not historians suddenly care about historical accuracy when it comes to the portrayal of women, but at no other time.

(especially since in virtually every case, there are actually loads of recorded women kicking ass and taking names... but don't mind me, I'm just an actual historian)

(Anonymous) 2016-01-31 10:50 pm (UTC)(link)
This. It comes up a lot in discussions in the SF/Fantasy genre and it's simply amazing how many people can accept spaceships, alien races, teleportation, dragons, mind control powers, winters that last 7 years, but women who are well developed characters? No way, dude!

(Anonymous) 2016-01-31 11:01 pm (UTC)(link)
Don't worry, they sometimes suddenly care about historical accuracy when it comes to the portrayal of anyone who isn't white! Or straight!