case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-01-31 03:36 pm

[ SECRET POST #3315 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3315 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01. [tb]


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 060 secrets from Secret Submission Post #474.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2016-01-31 10:14 pm (UTC)(link)
Has anyone ever actually meaningfully tested this, though?

I mean, I'm familiar with the thing where you write an extremely general and vague - but positive - description and ask people if it describes them and they say yes. But has anybody ever tried writing down extremely definite descriptions and giving them out to people and seeing if there are significant differences in whether or not people identify with them? It seems like it shouldn't even be that hard of a study to execute, really.
tabaqui: (Default)

[personal profile] tabaqui 2016-01-31 10:21 pm (UTC)(link)
I...would have no idea whatsoever. :)