case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-02-02 06:51 pm

[ SECRET POST #3317 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3317 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.
[D.Gray-man - Miranda Lotto]


__________________________________________________



06.
[The Thick of It]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Golden Kamui]


__________________________________________________



08.
(The Lost Boys)


__________________________________________________



09.
[Marble Hornets/troyhasacamera]


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.
[@midnight with Chris Hardwick]



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 037 secrets from Secret Submission Post #474.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2016-02-03 09:30 am (UTC)(link)
yeah, I don't like those notes either.

(tangent now) a lot of it is personal preference, but! this wankery around inflated comments?

(Anonymous) 2016-02-03 01:55 pm (UTC)(link)
AYRT

a lot of it is personal preference, but! this wankery around inflated comments?

It's such a Machiavellian perspective!

I will say, there was one time I was annoyed to open a fic with 26 comments only to discover that it wasn't a decent-to-good fic with 13 to 26 comment threads, but an abysmal fic with 2 comment threads, the longer of which was the author and a super-enthusiastic reader analyzing the fic in exhaustive detail. But even then, I was much less annoyed at the author than I was at AO3 for displaying the number of comments rather than the number of comment threads. And I certainly wasn't so paranoid as to imagine that the author was engaging in the conversation for some devious purpose!