[ SECRET POST #3318 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3318 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 026 secrets from Secret Submission Post #474.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

+1, but it is surprising how much the 'starvation mode' argument comes up, even on boards that work with healthy weightloss. But, on the one hand, it does seem to deter the people who will try to get away with eating only 600 cals.

However, the anon above who wants the "a sensible amount" appended to this advice - this seems like a thing that goes without saying, and yet we always seem to have to say to everyone "obviously, only do this to a sensible amount." Why isn't the "sensible amount" a given?