Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-02-03 06:57 pm
[ SECRET POST #3318 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3318 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 026 secrets from Secret Submission Post #474.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-04 03:59 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-04 04:06 am (UTC)(link)They are still ignoring a large population of women when they only have one go to body type for characters. Something being made in Japan is not an excuse.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-04 04:24 am (UTC)(link)i guess i just don't really see why it matters. fiction has always been about the ideal, and i know that my body type isn't considered the attractive ideal. it doesn't particularly bother me because, well, it's fiction, not reality. i mean if we really want to be realistic, there shouldn't be so many conventionally attractive characters on tv and in games as well because most people you encounter day-to-day aren't drop-dead gorgeous like most actors.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-04 04:31 am (UTC)(link)And do you ever wonder *why* your bodytype is not considered the attractive ideal? We aren't all born thinking that a certain body type is best, it's something we learn as we take from the environment around us and that includes things like video games. That's why body diversity in media is important, because it leaves more room for people to have all sorts of fantasies rather then having the same boring fantasy type over and over again.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-04 05:31 am (UTC)(link)i fully admit to being shallow. i want to look at pretty people in my media. if i wanted to look at average-looking people, i'd go to the mall.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-04 05:48 am (UTC)(link)And health is not really the best definer of what is beautiful, because people can be extremely unhealthy and still be considered conventionally attractive. Hollywood is notorious for this because many men and women in the industry have eating disorders and drug habits.
I'm not proposing "attractive" people be taken away, just that we expand what we consider attractive and give people who want to see other types of people options. I think if you had grown up in a world where different types of beauty was appreciated, you might feel differently about yourself then you do.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-04 08:19 am (UTC)(link)what would be more productive would be working on getting people to stop caring so much about whether or not they fit societal standards of physical beauty because it IS such a shallow thing. how pretty you are has no bearing on what kind of person you are or what you're capable of accomplishing.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-04 03:53 pm (UTC)(link)Whatever your opinion on what really matters in a person, what we do *now* is extremely harmful to people. Whether the definition of beauty needs to be expanded or people need to start caring about it less, either way the best way to accomplish that is to allow for more diversity.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-04 06:58 am (UTC)(link)no subject