Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-02-10 06:51 pm
[ SECRET POST #3325 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3325 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 027 secrets from Secret Submission Post #475.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-11 12:09 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-11 12:11 am (UTC)(link)Someone being a great singer is not a physical trait of theirs, its a skill of theirs.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-11 12:26 am (UTC)(link)The character is still the same character with hair. Him having hair is shown in the series. Fans want to fap over that instead of a bald guy, they can go for it.
I agree that his baldness is iconic. That doesn't mean fans suddenly must appreciate him sexually for that if they are going to at all.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-11 01:03 am (UTC)(link)The OP is clearly talking about physical traits here, then continuing to refer to them as traits later on. It's like basic reading comprehension.
I said nothing about finding the trait sexually appealing or not. I am only talking about that it is distinctive, which it is. You're arguing the wrong argument to the wrong person. I don't know why you are doing that.
no subject
They only mention the word "trait" once, and it's without physical in front of it. Prior to that, they say "being bald is a HUGE part of Saitama's character" and later describe it as an "integral part of a character".
I'm sorry but that's weird? Being bald is not a huge part of a person's character, nor is it an integral part of their being.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-11 03:11 pm (UTC)(link)The guy's superhero name is "Caped Baldy". He lost all his hair from his intense training. He's defensive as fuck about his baldness.
It's literally is one of the most defining traits of this character.
no subject
He's defensive as fuck about his baldness.
It's literally is one of the most defining traits of this character.
Still don't see how that makes it his most defining character trait. The character traits that make him defensive--where another character might shrug the baldness off--are a more defining character trait. Even before he was bald, he had those character traits.
So why would the baldness itself be more defining?