[ SECRET POST #3336 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3336 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 059 secrets from Secret Submission Post #477.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Christian - KKK
Christian - Anti abortion terrorism
White people - white power groups, stormfront
Animal rights - PETA, ALF
Islam - ISIS
Feminists - TERFs & radfems
Men - MRA

I could go on? Do you want me to?

[blitzwing]

Pretty sure most Christians these days aren't apologists for the KKK. Most white people seem disgusted by neonazies and blatant white supremacists.

ALF rarely comes up but I've known lots of environmentalists that were willing to express their disgust for PETA and never made excuses for it.

Feminists - TERFs & radfems

Funny you mention TERFs & radfems. You're making it look like a doctrinal split once again--modern feminists VS radfems. That's not an indication that feminists are willing to call out extremist elements within their own group, that's evidence of two subgroups with opposing doctrinal beliefs being willing to label the other as evil and misguided.

Men - MRA

That one doesn't even make sense. That would be like you going "Women - Feminism". Very few men identify as MRAs. We're talking about people calling out extremist elements of groups they belong to.

[(Anonymous)]

You're making it look like a doctrinal split once again--modern feminists VS radfems. That's not an indication that feminists are willing to call out extremist elements within their own group, that's evidence of two subgroups

You are literally making up your own interpretation of feminist reality that does not mesh with the understanding everyone else in this thread is operating on. Yet you seem to expect we're going to accept your interpretation over our own, and engage with you in a way that adheres to your own contrarian view of these issues.

But, like, no, we're not going to do that (at least I'm not). Because, from what I can see, most of us don't agree with several of the basic suppositions from which you are basing your arguments.

[blitzwing]

(at least I'm not

Of course you're not. You made a list and every single item was shown to be based on faulty reasoning. I'm not surprised you're creating an excuse so you can to bail out and avoid acknowledging you were wrong. Don't worry, I don't judge you for it nonny.

[(Anonymous)]

Lol, nice try. I'm a different anon from the one who made that list.

I agree with their examples, and I think your ability to think clearly and logically is extremely compromised by your huge bias in this area, but I'm not the one who tossed out those examples. Or have you not realized that almost everybody in this thread disagrees with you? It's not just one person ganging up on you blitz; your warped ideas about this subject really are just that unpopular.

Also, I just want to take a moment to appreciate how hard you're projecting here, accusing me of creating excuses to bail, when you are basically saying "YOUR ARGUMENT IS INVALID BECAUSE YOUR LIST IS WRONG AND YOU'RE BUTTHURT I PROVED IT!" when A) it's not my list, B) that was my first comment in this thread, and C) saying those items were based on faulty reasoning does not make it true. So remind me again...who's creating excuses to bail? I'd say "I don't judge you for it" blitzy, but I'm really not that disingenuous.

Bottom line: People in this thread have already contested your illogical viewpoints, multiple times, and I've been watching you do all kinds of amusing contortions in order to deny the validity of their arguments. So no, I don't think I'll repeat their well articulated arguments for your willfully deaf ears. I'm happy to simply point and laugh.