case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-02-21 03:55 pm

[ SECRET POST #3336 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3336 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 059 secrets from Secret Submission Post #477.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: genuinely confused

(Anonymous) 2016-02-21 11:39 pm (UTC)(link)
Unless of course it's _romantic Asexual amirite?

...I like how everyone says Asexuals aren't oppressed but then goes "your orientation doesn't exist/isn't valid". Now I remember why I hate this community so much.

Re: genuinely confused

(Anonymous) 2016-02-22 02:18 am (UTC)(link)
nah nah nah you're missing the point. Not saying asexuality doesn't exist or isn't valid, just that it's not an orientation: orientation referring, after all, to what sort of people you're attracted to. So by definition asexuality's a separate thing, not an orientation.

Re: genuinely confused

(Anonymous) 2016-02-22 03:34 am (UTC)(link)
A couple of articles which make clear that this is in no way a settled issue:

http://www.apositive.org/wordpress_backup/?page_id=222

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/18/asexual-disorder_n_3361472.html?1371562287