[ SECRET POST #3336 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3336 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 059 secrets from Secret Submission Post #477.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

That IS taking feminism and gender equality to an extreme, making it out to be a zero-sum game of two genders only which are always in a competition where women must 'beat' men to achieve equality due to men historically being the winners, instead of working at cooperation for the future.

Emphasis mine.

That's why it's feminist extremism, it's all about gender equality taken to an extreme. Gender equality is a feminist fundamental.

[blitzwing]

The belief that there are two genders, one of which has been historically oppressed, and must fight to take a dominant role in society if they ever want to be equal, just doesn't seem that intrinsically extreme to me.

When you factor in that extremist is also a term that has the qualifier "especially one who resorts to or advocates extreme action." it's even less so.

"Eliminate the patriarchy" = not that extreme. "Eliminate the patriarchy by neglecting male babies" = extreme.