[ SECRET POST #3336 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3336 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 059 secrets from Secret Submission Post #477.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: genuinely confused

[erinptah]

So here's a third potential configuration: biromantic homosexual guy, has a girlfriend who likes sex, and will "go through sex for" those girlfriends -- but insists on identifying as gay.

How often does that one happen? Because I swear I've never seen it.

The only time I see people going "you are within my romantic orientation, so I will 'go through sex' for you, but I'm going to continue to identify you as being outside my sexual orientation" is with people who identify as asexual. [ETA: well, and the friends of the anon downthread.]

Re: genuinely confused

[cbrachyrhynchos]

What, you've never seen "gay/lesbian with an exception" in spite of the fact that we get at least three heavily reblogged articles by people who claim that a year?

Re: genuinely confused

[erinptah]

We must be following different subsets of Tumblr.

I have seen a couple of people go from "gay/lesbian/straight with an exception" to "you know what, I wasn't sure about a bi/pan identity before, but now I'm going to embrace it."

I wish the discourse would hurry up and evolve a set of labels that mean "interested in x/not interested in y, no exceptions, seriously, none, if I had a different set of interests I would be using a different label."

Re: genuinely confused

[cbrachyrhynchos]

There's more to the LGBT community than tumblr.

For one thing, tumblr seems unusually obsessed with pigeonholing sexualities into rigid categories.