Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-02-21 03:55 pm
[ SECRET POST #3336 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3336 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 059 secrets from Secret Submission Post #477.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
no subject
That Christmas celebrations brought in Pagan elements is true, but that Christmas began as a Pagan holiday is not.
no subject
Assuming Jesus was actually real, nobody actually knows when he was born. The likely explanation (though some disagree) for December 25 being the chosen date was because that happened to be the date of a Roman festival in worship of Sol Invictus. Winter solstice festivals like that one were popular at the time, so naturally they got incorporated.
You're being overly literal here. If you want to argue that Christmas didn't exist until the Christians invented it, then technically Christmas didn't exist until 1038 at the earliest when the Old English word Crīstesmæsse was first recorded.
no subject
In fact it's believed by many that Sol Invictus may have been created as a Pagan ALTERNATIVE to the Roman Christian significance of the 25th of December.
Either way, it's a fact that 12/25 as the designation of Jesus's birth, thus the obvious choice for day of celebration, predates Sol Invictus.
no subject
All this is besides the point in that you're operating on an overly narrow and literal version of Christmas history. By your rigid standards for what constitutes "Christmas," I could argue the holiday didn't technically start until the 1930s when Coca-Cola invented the modern version of Santa. It's a ridiculous, stupid argument, sure, but so is pretending that Christmas was invented out of whole cloth with no basis in pre-existing winter festivals.
no subject
Actually I outright said that some Christmas traditions are taken from Pagan ones, if you read. But that Christmas was 'originally a Pagan celebration' is patently false.
no subject
I'm not. Try reading my comment again.