[ SECRET POST #3336 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3336 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 059 secrets from Secret Submission Post #477.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[philstar22]

No, it really wouldn't. That's not what an asexual is, or at least not what all of them are. You have a pretty narrow understanding of asexual there, as does the secret. Sure there are some asexuals who are anti-sex to the point they think it is awful and no one should ever like it. But that is not most of them at all.

[(Anonymous)]

I'm talking about the asexuals who got me thoroughly sick of the words "cake," "zucchini," and "squish," back in 2014: cake does nothing for them and they can't understand all the fuss and altogether too much fuss is made about cake. There was definitely an attitude of superiority to all those promiscuous sexysexuals for whom sex is a valued part of their lives.

[philstar22]

They exist, sure. But they are a very small portion of asexuals. Those asexuals probably aren't writing porn. And the secret didn't specify them, it just said asexuals. I know asexuals who write very good porn. You can be asexual and write porn.