[ SECRET POST #3338 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3338 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 036 secrets from Secret Submission Post #477.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Choose to consider giving your prof a bad eval.

[diet_poison]

Fair enough.

Re: Choose to consider giving your prof a bad eval.

[chardmonster]

I mean that's the thing; I'm speaking from experience here.

Everyone who teaches--either a grade school teacher or a prof or a TA like me--have to recycle because otherwise we'd go crazy. There's no reason to totally recreate a class every year. But recycling involves editing. You improve things that might not have worked last year. You update slides when new scholarship comes out or procedures change. I've changed the direction of sections slightly because I knew I had a bunch of STEM majors and wanted to add more science and tech history.

That's the thing--good teaching isn't just repeating the same shit all the time. That's why this makes me angry. It's just... lazy. Plenty of lazy people skate but it's still not good.

Re: Choose to consider giving your prof a bad eval.

[diet_poison]

I ain't arguing.