case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-02-27 02:46 pm

[ SECRET POST #3342 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3342 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 081 secrets from Secret Submission Post #478.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - random meme ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2016-02-27 08:32 pm (UTC)(link)
Maybe I'm more familiar with the behavior of intentfully misreading canons, idk. I see this happen all the time with people willfully misreading sexualities because they don't like the idea of certain characters being gay or prefer "straight versions" of them and while yeah, it's homophobic, I wouldn't call it erasing real people or denying they exist, unless they're going around insisting that their version is canon and other people should agree. Which I have also seen.

OP isn't doing that. They're doing the lesser evil of choosing to interpret things their own transphobic way.