case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-03-05 12:28 pm

[ SECRET POST #3349 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3349 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
[X/1999]










Notes:

Early today, places to go!

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 060 secrets from Secret Submission Post #479.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 - random memes with no secrets in them ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Advice

(Anonymous) 2016-03-05 09:45 pm (UTC)(link)
maybe something like comments can't be discouraging, but constructive criticism is allowed or have the author's specify what kind of responses they want? (like criticism wanted/help on plot/or whatever)

Re: Advice

(Anonymous) 2016-03-05 09:52 pm (UTC)(link)
Thank you. I think that sounds like a fair compromise. I don't want to outlaw helpful criticism but I don't want people coming in to tells someone an idea is hopeless.

It's not so much "if you don't have something nice to say don't say anything at all" and more "give criticism to help people and build them up, don't just discourage someone and tear them down".

Honestly I might just make a caveat for idea bouncing threads - "if you can't stand fics like the one being suggested it might be best to avoid the thread unless you have a suggestion to help the author improve."