[ SECRET POST #3349 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3349 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
[X/1999]










Notes:

Early today, places to go!

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 060 secrets from Secret Submission Post #479.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 - random memes with no secrets in them ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Safety for Freedom

[feotakahari]

I'm biased on this one, because I used to be a big fan of Jenny Blanchard. She's lethally allergic to cigarette smoke and has taken more than one trip to the emergency room because of folks smoking in a "smoke-free zone." If you've got a tomato allergy or a wheat allergy, you can simply watch what you eat, but you can't really watch what you breathe unless you wear a gas mask.

Re: Safety for Freedom

[(Anonymous)]

I don't know who that is but wouldn't any old smoke trigger the same reaction? Not saying that it'should not true but it sounds a little off to me. My father had severe asthma and problems with smoke but usually a few meters of distance would do the trick. And his attacks would also be triggered by proximity to dogs or cats, like if someone stood next to him and hairs from their clothes would end up on his... I wouldn't want to ban cats or dogs for that...
I believe that you should protect people from situations in which they are forced to inhale 2nd hand smoke regularly but seriously, there are some regulations that simply cross a line because the gravity of the restriction is in no relation to the actual risk. Like Europe banning menthol cigarettes. That's just... I don't even know. It's like "we can't ban cigarettes outright so we're just gonna ban the most niche cigarette kind ever" Aparrently it's "for teh kidz!" But kids don't even smoke menthol. At least no one did back at my high school.

Re: Safety for Freedom

[(Anonymous)]

"wouldn't any old smoke trigger the same reaction?"

Not if it is a nicotine allergy. Cigarette smoke gives me headaches and other smoke doesn't.

Re: Safety for Freedom

[(Anonymous)]

DA
did you have that diagnosed? could be just your head reacting to some olfactory trigger. also better not eat too much eggplant, then.

Re: Safety for Freedom

[(Anonymous)]

You seem weirdly invested in the idea of subjecting people to unwanted cigarette smoke