case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-03-05 12:28 pm

[ SECRET POST #3349 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3349 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
[X/1999]










Notes:

Early today, places to go!

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 060 secrets from Secret Submission Post #479.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 - random memes with no secrets in them ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: The Hobbit Movies

(Anonymous) 2016-03-05 11:29 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't think it was for teenage fangirls. They're only a small percentage of the audience, so pandering to them doesn't make a whole lot of sense. If they were doing that, they would've put in Thranduil shirtless, or Thorin/Bilbo making out or Fili/Kili having an oddly intimate moment.

What DOES make sense (sort of, from a marketing point of view) is that Legolas is an established, recognizable character from a very, very successful trilogy in the same universe. THAT'S why he's there.