[ SECRET POST #3349 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3349 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
[X/1999]










Notes:

Early today, places to go!

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 060 secrets from Secret Submission Post #479.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 - random memes with no secrets in them ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Showgirls

[(Anonymous)]

NAYRT but I think when the argument boils down to "the acting is so bad it's maybe SUPPOSED to be bad", that's a pretty clear cut indictment of the movie's quality. Mind you, a movie doesn't have to be good to be enjoyable, but people often conflate the two and think that because they enjoyed a movie, therefore it must be good.

Re: Showgirls

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT

That's what I was talking about... really, I want OP of this thread to defend the acting to me. That film wasn't written to be a comedy, it was meant to be SERIOUS DRAMA, so what gives?