Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-03-08 07:19 pm
[ SECRET POST #3352 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3352 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 032 secrets from Secret Submission Post #479.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Dapper Brides and thoughts on clothes
(Anonymous) 2016-03-09 03:14 am (UTC)(link)I found a few though.
http://offbeatbride.com/2011/04/kansas-city-bookish-wedding
http://sh-www-prod.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/3/640x845/4596.jpg
http://offbeatbride.com/2016/01/rustic-potluck-wedding
http://offbeatbride.com/2015/06/new-york-city-bride-in-pants
http://offbeatbride.com/2014/12/maine-jazz-wedding
http://bridalmusings.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Bride-in-Pants-White-Wedding-Suit-Bridal-Musings-Wedding-Blog-0.jpg
I 99% sure these people are models, but it counts as a wedding outfit marketed towards heterosexual couples.
This is not counting the dozens of runway models advertising pants suits for brides I scrolled past.
Re: Dapper Brides and thoughts on clothes
(Anonymous) 2016-03-09 03:22 am (UTC)(link)Re: Dapper Brides and thoughts on clothes
(Anonymous) 2016-03-09 04:05 am (UTC)(link)Re: Dapper Brides and thoughts on clothes
(Anonymous) 2016-03-09 04:28 am (UTC)(link)Re: Dapper Brides and thoughts on clothes
I am very much in favor of wedding suits, of all different sorts.