case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-03-09 06:48 pm

[ SECRET POST #3353 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3353 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Beverly Hills Cop 3]


__________________________________________________



03.
[New Tricks]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Lord of the Rings]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Splatoon]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Tessa Stone/Not Drunk Enough/Hanna is not a Boy's Name]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Actor Frank Kelly, playing Father Jack Hackett in Father Ted]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Frasier]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Jem and the Holograms comic]











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 022 secrets from Secret Submission Post #479.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
kaijinscendre: (Default)

Re: What won't you sexualize, fiction-wise?

[personal profile] kaijinscendre 2016-03-10 12:04 am (UTC)(link)
Children because that is gross.

Re: What won't you sexualize, fiction-wise?

(Anonymous) 2016-03-10 12:18 am (UTC)(link)
At first I read "Chicken because that is gross" and I didn't know whether I agreed or disagreed...

Re: What won't you sexualize, fiction-wise?

(Anonymous) 2016-03-10 12:20 am (UTC)(link)
You're really not sure about that? 'kaaay.

Re: What won't you sexualize, fiction-wise?

(Anonymous) 2016-03-10 12:21 am (UTC)(link)
Chicken is delicious. But not particularly sexy.
kaijinscendre: (Default)

Re: What won't you sexualize, fiction-wise?

[personal profile] kaijinscendre 2016-03-10 12:24 am (UTC)(link)
Chicken is amazing. Best meat ever.

Re: What won't you sexualize, fiction-wise?

(Anonymous) 2016-03-10 12:28 am (UTC)(link)
But still, sexualizing chicken meat, even fictional?
kaijinscendre: (Default)

Re: What won't you sexualize, fiction-wise?

[personal profile] kaijinscendre 2016-03-10 12:34 am (UTC)(link)
I have seen some sexy fried chicken in my day.

Re: What won't you sexualize, fiction-wise?

(Anonymous) 2016-03-10 12:40 am (UTC)(link)
Oh god, now you made me think about Matthew McConaughey.
kaijinscendre: (Default)

Re: What won't you sexualize, fiction-wise?

[personal profile] kaijinscendre 2016-03-10 12:49 am (UTC)(link)
He is also gross.
fingalsanteater: (Default)

Re: What won't you sexualize, fiction-wise?

[personal profile] fingalsanteater 2016-03-10 01:53 am (UTC)(link)
Oh my god. I know what you are referencing and jfc that movie.