case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-03-09 06:48 pm

[ SECRET POST #3353 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3353 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Beverly Hills Cop 3]


__________________________________________________



03.
[New Tricks]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Lord of the Rings]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Splatoon]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Tessa Stone/Not Drunk Enough/Hanna is not a Boy's Name]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Actor Frank Kelly, playing Father Jack Hackett in Father Ted]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Frasier]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Jem and the Holograms comic]











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 022 secrets from Secret Submission Post #479.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Ghostbusters

(Anonymous) 2016-03-10 12:50 am (UTC)(link)
I liked this one. I liked the last one too, but this one made me laugh more.

I'm not sure how I feel about the leaked plot. The guy who leaked it sounds incredibly butthurt, more from a nostalgia point of view than a misogynistic one. The fact that he was looking for the older Ghostbusters so much makes me take his review with a grain of salt. (plus, his hateboner for product placement, use of youtube, etc. - it just seems so petty).

I have had nostalgia for some things, so I get it on one level. But the original Ghostbusters was only vaguely entertaining to me, and I'm not expecting this to be a masterpiece. It looks fun; that's all I want.