[ SECRET POST #3354 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3354 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.
[Yu-Gi-Oh]


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09. [ warning for homophobia / transphobia / misogyny take your pick, people seem to be divided on this one ]













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 009 secrets from Secret Submission Post #479.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Question

[(Anonymous)]

they are both tied into historical sexist assumptions about women being owned by their husbands. If she isnt' taking his name, why would she feel the need to be given away to him?

Re: Question

[(Anonymous)]

Well, I mean, traditional weddings are rather rife with these historical overtones anyway. The idea that the groom is stood up front waiting for the bride (dressed in white of course!) is downright weird when you think of it. So I don't think it's any more weird to have a parental escort of some type. I had both my parents walk me down, FWIW.