case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-03-10 06:44 pm

[ SECRET POST #3354 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3354 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.
[Yu-Gi-Oh]


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09. [ warning for homophobia / transphobia / misogyny take your pick, people seem to be divided on this one ]













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 009 secrets from Secret Submission Post #479.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
ginainthekingsroad: a scan of a Victorian fashion plate; a dark haired woman with glasses (me?) (Default)

[personal profile] ginainthekingsroad 2016-03-11 08:30 am (UTC)(link)
No underwear in the Regency era.

This is true to a degree, but not entirely. Many women would just wear a chemise and their stays (Directiore/Regency corset) and nothing on the lower body. It's the Regency period when we start to see womens' drawers called pantalettes (these were past knee-length), starting around 1810; and general drawers (typically knee-length) common by 1835. Here's a picture from The History of Underclothes. Imperialism and expanded sea shipping played a role in the adoption of drawers, because cotton fabric from India (and to a lesser extent the US) became a lot more affordable, quickly!