case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-03-11 06:42 pm

[ SECRET POST #3355 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3355 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[The Lord of the Rings]



__________________________________________________



02.
[Digimon Story: Cyber Sleuth]


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.
[Partners in Crime]


__________________________________________________



05.
[The 100]


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________











08. [SPOILERS for Undertale]




__________________________________________________



09. [SPOILERS for The 100]













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #479.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2016-03-12 12:23 am (UTC)(link)
Nooooo, don't you see, the writers made her a lesbian because they knew she was going to die eventually! It's all a carefully plotted conspiracy from the beginning because every writer's biggest obsession is showing the world how much they hate lesbians!

(Anonymous) 2016-03-12 12:28 am (UTC)(link)
One of the show's writers admitted that they had actually discussed that specific trope ("Bury Your Gays" vis-a-vis Tara in Buffy) and had arrogantly concluded they could carry it off better than anyone else.

So fucking excuse YOU, anon.

(Anonymous) 2016-03-12 12:31 am (UTC)(link)
Source? I haven't seen any interviews with the writers about "Thirteen", just Jason Rothenberg.

(Anonymous) 2016-03-12 01:01 am (UTC)(link)
Example:

http://okbjgm.tumblr.com/post/140772197406/and-if-you-guys-didnt-anticipate-this-much

(Anonymous) 2016-03-12 01:22 am (UTC)(link)
Nope. Not buying it. I bet they discussed the trope because it's a good thing to be aware that tropes exist, and concluded that what they were doing wasn't an example. Because it isn't.