case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-03-11 06:42 pm

[ SECRET POST #3355 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3355 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[The Lord of the Rings]



__________________________________________________



02.
[Digimon Story: Cyber Sleuth]


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.
[Partners in Crime]


__________________________________________________



05.
[The 100]


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________











08. [SPOILERS for Undertale]




__________________________________________________



09. [SPOILERS for The 100]













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #479.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Men of F!S

(Anonymous) 2016-03-12 12:34 am (UTC)(link)
Well that would relate more to your belief about me than my question, wouldn't it? I can be held accountable only for my question, and as I say, my opinions are not relevant to the question.

Re: Men of F!S

(Anonymous) 2016-03-12 12:36 am (UTC)(link)
What you say and what the reality is are two different things.

Re: Men of F!S

(Anonymous) 2016-03-12 12:51 am (UTC)(link)
This can be true. But in this case what I say is related only to the reality as I created it. The question is on my intentions and in that, I am the only person qualified to talk.

Re: Men of F!S

(Anonymous) 2016-03-12 12:56 am (UTC)(link)
Now you're just babbling. It's easy for us to infer your intentions because in the current environment there is no safe way to answer that question. Anyone would be suspicious, especially when you have so far refused to elaborate on what you personally think is "enough."

Re: Men of F!S

(Anonymous) 2016-03-12 01:14 am (UTC)(link)
If you've inferred that my intention is to attack people, you have inferred incorrectly. And I agree that assumption is a problem with F!S as it stands, too often that inference would be correct. Not here, though.

And I suppose I agree, suspicion is appropriate, but it shouldn't be. But giving my opinion would defeat my question, which was intended to be a "Your actions VS your values". Introducing my values as a counterpoint would have turned it into a "Your actions VS My values" question.

Re: Men of F!S

(Anonymous) 2016-03-12 01:20 am (UTC)(link)
suspicion is appropriate, but it shouldn't be

So what do you plan to do about it?

Re: Men of F!S

(Anonymous) 2016-03-12 01:36 am (UTC)(link)
Make my post, stick to my guns, and try to show I am as unworthy of the suspicion as I'm able in how I interact with the people who answer me.

Re: Men of F!S

(Anonymous) 2016-03-12 01:38 am (UTC)(link)
Good luck with that.

Re: Men of F!S

(Anonymous) 2016-03-12 01:49 am (UTC)(link)
Depending on how I should read that, either: Thanks or: You have a better idea?