case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-03-11 06:42 pm

[ SECRET POST #3355 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3355 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[The Lord of the Rings]



__________________________________________________



02.
[Digimon Story: Cyber Sleuth]


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.
[Partners in Crime]


__________________________________________________



05.
[The 100]


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________











08. [SPOILERS for Undertale]




__________________________________________________



09. [SPOILERS for The 100]













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #479.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Men of F!S

(Anonymous) 2016-03-12 12:37 am (UTC)(link)
Yes it fucking is.

Re: Men of F!S

(Anonymous) 2016-03-12 12:38 am (UTC)(link)
There is no reason to be so hostile. My intentions are my own to know. You are no more able to speculate on my intentions than I am able to speculate on why you're being aggressive.

Can I ask why you're being so aggressive?

Re: Men of F!S

(Anonymous) 2016-03-12 12:45 am (UTC)(link)
No, because you've so far refused to explain your intentions with this thread and accused someone of being defensive for wanting you to elaborate on your original question. The more you post the more I grow to dislike you and your barely-veiled sanctimony.

Re: Men of F!S

(Anonymous) 2016-03-12 01:01 am (UTC)(link)
I'm no more obligated to explain my intentions than you are to answer my question in the first place. You will see me not pressing anyone to an answer they don't wish to give.

Again, I read the comment as defensive. I may have misread it. I apologised.

Re: Men of F!S

(Anonymous) 2016-03-12 01:06 am (UTC)(link)
If we're not obligated to answer, then why post the question in the first place? Especially given that you had to know that the question would be taken as it has been. You won't even tell us what you think is enough. You may have apologized to that one anon but you still refuse to do what they and others have asked.

Re: Men of F!S

(Anonymous) 2016-03-12 01:33 am (UTC)(link)
So people should only post about things everyone is obligated to respond to? I posed the question because I wanted to know how people would answer it.

My posting here my ideals sit in this regard would have been the exact thing you're accusing me of trying to do, i.e. making this a thread where I crow about how good a person I am an how no-one can live up to my ideals and that makes them a bad personTM.

I refuse to do what they ask because I am free to do that, and doing what they ask (and in fact some of it can come off sounding more like demands rather than asks) would still be exactly the opposite of what I wanted this thread to be.

Re: Men of F!S

(Anonymous) 2016-03-12 01:39 am (UTC)(link)
You're asking us to trust you in good faith that you're not a radfem troll, but you refuse to actually do anything to earn that trust. Okay then.

Re: Men of F!S

(Anonymous) 2016-03-12 01:58 am (UTC)(link)
trust you in good faith

earn that trust