case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-03-13 04:15 pm

[ SECRET POST #3357 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3357 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 078 secrets from Secret Submission Post #480.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
tcex28: (fujiko-chaaan)

[personal profile] tcex28 2016-03-13 08:36 pm (UTC)(link)
If this was someone you liked, would you blink twice at them holding their baby in an artsy photoshoot?

(Anonymous) 2016-03-13 09:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Not OP, but I for one would. I would even side-eye someone I liked harder because I would have assumed they thought better than that.

(Anonymous) 2016-03-13 09:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Same here.

(Anonymous) 2016-03-13 10:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Not the OP but... If it was just an artsy photoshoot? Nope. But if it was a photoshoot that was meant to promote their business... yeah, kinda.

(Anonymous) 2016-03-13 11:51 pm (UTC)(link)
http://ultimateclassicrock.com/paul-mccartney-mccartney-cute-babies-on-album-covers/

I didn't mind Paul McCartney doing it, so I don't mind Palmer doing it. Mind you, Paul used the photo with his baby daughter on the back cover.

(Anonymous) 2016-03-14 03:37 am (UTC)(link)
To be fair, that album was released in an age where distribution wasn't as fast or widespread as it is today. It's like sharing photos of your baby with your extended family and maybe some neighbors in your town vs. sharing photos of your baby with the entire freaking internet.

(Anonymous) 2016-03-14 09:06 am (UTC)(link)
Although, as Paul was a Beatle, an awful lot of people could be expected to take notice of that album.