[ SECRET POST #3357 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3357 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 078 secrets from Secret Submission Post #480.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I don't think there is anything wrong with a mother taking pictures of her baby or of a mother getting pictures taken of her with her baby. I do have somewhat of an issue with a mother seemingly using her baby as a prop in a publicity photo, so it is about the mother, not the child.

[tcex28]

What makes the baby a prop rather than a subject? Is it that she's not looking directly at it?

[(Anonymous)]

I'm not a professional photographer, but usually the subject of a photo is the person or object that's central to the eye. That would be Amanda Palmer in the pic in question. Look at how it's composed. The baby doesn't even get as much focus as the machete she's holding.

But the real tip off is that it's a promotional shoot for her new single.