[ SECRET POST #3357 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3357 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 078 secrets from Secret Submission Post #480.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

OP isn't implying there are better books, OP is implying that they expected Rickman to have better taste in books. That's why everyone is saying "liking HP isn't bad taste" - because it is a direct response to what OP is saying.

It IS what OP said.

[(Anonymous)]

Er, no. If the OP had said that they expected Rickman to have good taste, then you'd be correct that the secret implies that liking HP is in bad taste. But that's not what the secret says.

When you say that something is better than something else, you're making a quality judgment in relative terms, not absolutes. Let's say you have two windowless rooms that are pitch black. Look at it this way. Winning the lottery and getting $10K is great, right? But winning the lottery and getting $100K is arguably better. Does that mean the $10K is bad? Of course not. It's just not as good as winning $100K.

You (and to be fair, quite a lot of other people in this thread) seem to be having a tough time understanding this.

[(Anonymous)]

Er, yes. When someone says "I expected xyz to have better taste," there's an implicit criticism. You seem to be having a tough time understanding basic English.