[ SECRET POST #3363 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3363 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 101 secrets from Secret Submission Post #481.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: The moment when Gawker gets called out in court for joking about child porn

[(Anonymous)]

What legal precedent? That if you post a sex tape of someone without their permission you will get sued into the ground?

Re: The moment when Gawker gets called out in court for joking about child porn

[(Anonymous)]

I don't think that's the entirety of the legal grounds in this specific case - there's a whole lot of stuff about public image and interest that gets wonky - although I agree from a moral point of view that they absolutely shouldn't have posted it.

Re: The moment when Gawker gets called out in court for joking about child porn

[(Anonymous)]

The precedent is that if it hurts a persons ability to generate income then you cannot report on anything which shows them in a bad light. You can see why this might be a problem? And also why a right-wing Florida Jury might love it.

Re: The moment when Gawker gets called out in court for joking about child porn

[(Anonymous)]

Bullshit. A sex tape is far different thing from Knight Rider wallowing around drunk with his Wendy's burger. You do not post sex tapes without a person's permission, period.

Re: The moment when Gawker gets called out in court for joking about child porn

[(Anonymous)]

That's - AFAIK - a moral distinction but not necessarily a legal one.