[ SECRET POST #3366 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3366 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 055 secrets from Secret Submission Post #481.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[philstar22]

There is no objective standard for what people find attractive or what is attractive. He may be ugly to you, but not everyone agrees. If you stop thinking of attractiveness as something objective, it would probably make you a lot less angry.

[(Anonymous)]

He is objectively ugly tho.

[philstar22]

No. There is no such thing. That is not how it works.

[(Anonymous)]

You can keep saying that, but that doesn't make it true.

Maybe just admit you want his dick, Lord knows you whiteknight him hard enough.

[philstar22]

I'm not actually attracted to him. I wouldn't say I find him ugly. I'm more meh about him.

And where do I whiteknight him? Liking a villain character is not the same as whiteknighting him. He did awful things and he's an awful person. I find him interesting.

[(Anonymous)]

You whiteknight Adam Driver in like every secret that criticizes his looks.

"not attracted to him" lol sure you aren't.

[philstar22]

I defend anyone who people call objectively ugly. Because I hate that term because I don't think there is such a thing. I don't care if people find him attractive or not, but it really pisses me off when people call their own personal tastes objective.

I do it more with him because people seem to hate him more and talk about him being "objectively ugly" a lot more. But I'll do it for other people too.

[mishey22]

I agree. There is no such thing as objectively ugly or objectively attractive. It's an eye of the beholder thing therefore there can't be any such thing.

[(Anonymous)]

you seem weirdly invested in whether or not philstar wants to hang Adam Driver, anon

[(Anonymous)]

Do you seriously believe that a woman or non-white person with his features would ever get the time of day? Seriously?

[philstar22]

If they were villains, yes, though maybe not to the same extent. Of course race is a factor and gender. It always is. But so is the fact that he's a villain. A lot of people really like villains.

[(Anonymous)]

But why would that make you hate Adam Driver? Is Adam Driver responsible for institutional racism and sexism?

[(Anonymous)]

I never said I hated Driver?

[(Anonymous)]

You know that there are objective standards of beauty among humans, though, right? Just because people are still attracted to those who fall outside of those standards doesn't mean that the standards don't exist.

[(Anonymous)]

Objective standards of beauty exist if you think of things like symmetry, balance of features etc. but those vary from culture to culture and as such are not globally objective at all.