case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-03-26 04:03 pm

[ SECRET POST #3370 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3370 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 070 secrets from Secret Submission Post #482.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Is it rude to assume that someone is straight?

(Anonymous) 2016-03-26 09:35 pm (UTC)(link)
No. Wrong. Absolutely wrong.

Self-identification is the only thing that we can meaningfully get data for. That does not mean that it is the only thing that exists. If we can't get reliable information on people's actual sexual identity, that just means that we can't get information on them. They remain two separate categories. Insufficient data on actual identity does not justify drawing incorrect conclusions by looking at totally different stats. It means we have insufficient data to reach a conclusion.