[ SECRET POST #3371 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3371 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 059 secrets from Secret Submission Post #482.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Nirvana fans

[(Anonymous)]

OP

Oh, fair enough then. Although towards the end of the song he ramps it up quite a bit, and it loses its 'bro relax' feel, which is a thing Sturgill does often in his songs.

Re: Nirvana fans

[(Anonymous)]

Now that I'm thinking about it, I don't know why he didn't cover Lithium instead of In Bloom. This genre of music would go much better with that song and - if he kept the same style he uses here - be a good cover of sounding literally medicated into happy relaxed submission, which keeps the original meaning intact while adding a creepy feel on top.

Re: Nirvana fans

[(Anonymous)]

OP

On his previous album he did a cover of an 80s pop song, and turned it into a sad ballad. I think he likes turning genres on their heads.

80s pop song: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HI_xFQWiYU
Sturgill's cover: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eWJmN8D820

Re: Nirvana fans

[(Anonymous)]

I can appreciate the genre-spinning. It just doesn't always work, is all. Especially with groups like Nirvana where the originals are usually already bitter angry songs being spun into something more upbeat.

Re: Nirvana fans

[(Anonymous)]

OP

Yeah, I get that. I guess I just don't have the same connection to the original, so whatever has been lost from it is going over my head.

Re: Nirvana fans

[(Anonymous)]

Have you ever listened to the original?

Re: Nirvana fans

[(Anonymous)]

OP

I have, but I'm still so unfamiliar with Nirvana and their intent to really make up my mind on it.

Re: Nirvana fans

[(Anonymous)]

Ramps it up?? Maybe in the sense of going from country ballad to sweeping American Idol inspirational number.

Re: Nirvana fans

[(Anonymous)]

OP

Sturgill knows how to burn up a stage, man. That cover is him at his mildest. Comparing him to American Idol contestants is laughable.

Re: Nirvana fans

[(Anonymous)]

Too bad he couldn't have brought some of that to this cover.

Re: Nirvana fans

[(Anonymous)]

OP

Eh, you win some you lose some.