[ SECRET POST #3374 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3374 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[Shiori Experience]



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 029 secrets from Secret Submission Post #482.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

unless they are always running around weight loss wont be THAT fast. it takes a long time to lose weight even if you are low on food. it's still slow. especially if you have a lot to lose
but uh, cool assuming that fat = villainous food thieves i guess.

[(Anonymous)]

Weight loss won't be THAT slow, either. And processed foods aren't around anymore so they only have fresh, healthy real food to eat. I don't know their story because i don't watch the show anymore but it doesn't make any sense to have a character who is that overweight, let alone two.

[(Anonymous)]

And processed foods aren't around anymore so they only have fresh, healthy real food to eat.

LMAO

If you wanna lose weight, go on a strict diet of rat meat and acorns. You heard it here first!

[greenvelvetcake]

...I was going to make a joke about it being the new fad diet, but I bet you could get a real following with "the apocalypse diet."

Although wait, why aren't processed foods around anymore? There should be an abundance of it, not spoiling.

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, I'm pretty sure I have a pack of Twinkies from 1997.

[loracarol]

Isn't that just called "paleo"?

JK/JK.

....Mostly.

So about that.

[chardmonster]

"Starvation mode" isn't a thing, but you can reach a point where your body freaks out and dramatically slows down weight loss because it's gotten used to a huge calorie deficit. It does things like burn fewer calories and hold on to fat as long as it can.

I know that because I'm in the middle of it after a long period of very strictly counting calories (food scale and all). I was consistently a couple hundred calories below my BMR. I lost a lot of weight but have now been stuck hovering around the same two pounds for months. Exercise doesn't fix the problem. I'm gradually upping my intake until I reach a point where my body stops freaking out and thinking there's a famine on.

Weight loss is simple... but also not simple.

Re: So about that.

[(Anonymous)]

Your body doesn't "freak out", it's just that caloric consumption corresponds to weight.

For example: Say you eat 2000cal per day and weigh 135lbs. Then for whatever reason, you limit your intake by 500cal. You will lose weight until you reach the weight where your body needs 1500cal. What people call "reaching a weight loss plateau" really just means the body can maintain the current weight at the amount of calories they are consuming.

So basically, you ate a few hundred calories under your BMR, and now instead of "gradually upping your intake", you need to face the reality that your new BMR is a few hundred calories lower than it used to be.
Congratulations on your weight loss! Please don't give up.

Re: So about that.

[(Anonymous)]

(Same anon) If you are female and eat 2000 calories per day, you would probably weigh quite a bit more than 135lbs.

Re: So about that.

[chardmonster]

Here's the thing. I've been eating between 1000-1200 calories every day, with the occasional cheat day that was never over 2000. That's strictly measured--everything down to a couple grams of honey in my tea was going on the scale. At my current height and activity level that's still way below my TDEE (calories you burn in a day) at my current weight. It's about 400 calories below my BMR (basic calories needed to live without moving around and all that) at my current weight, and 300 calories below my projected BMR at my target weight.

I wasn't eating back exercise calories. I also wasn't hungry, so I didn't see a problem--this didn't feel like starving myself. I've lost about 45 pounds this way, but it suddenly stopped in January.

Pretty much all diet advice that isn't strictly about getting yourself as skinny as possible is against what I was doing--they're all saying don't go below your BMR for too long or there are consequences. I'm currently dealing with them--I'm going off diet for a week or two (conveniently, the period I've got Easter candy to eat through!) and have only gained a a pound or two of water weight. It seems to be confirming my suspicions.

My goals aren't just to lose weight. I want to be healthier. I'd rather be a little chunky and strong than skinny with no energy on a couch. So I'm really concerned if my body is reacting this way.

Re: So about that.

[(Anonymous)]

Congratulations on losing 45lbs, that is a huge accomplishment.

I don't know how you calculated your BMR and TDEE, and I'm not going to argue that you know very well how many calories you are consuming. You obviously know how to count calories, since you have made it this far! Your goal is absolutely commendable, and there's obviously nothing wrong with eating some candy every now and again.

However, weight gain is never a sign of eating too little. The consequences of going under your BMR include things like anemia, poor concentration, low energy, and other symptoms of malnutrition.

Re: So about that.

[chardmonster]

Thanks!

Luckily I haven't gained anything--I keep circling around the same mark without any noticeable size difference. Sometimes I'll suddenly be down a couple pounds, only to bounce back up in the next couple days. Changing my macros doesn't seem to affect this; low carb is the same as high, high fat is the same as low fat. I've prioritized making sure I get protein.

I've also noticed things like low energy.

I've used a few calculators (plus whatever comes with myfitnesspal), but this has gotten the best reviews: http://www.health-calc.com/diet/energy-expenditure-advanced

Re: So about that.

[(Anonymous)]

That weight you are circling is where your TDEE is "1000-1200 calories every day, with the occasional cheat day never over 2000."

Changing the macros doesn't affect your weight because you are still consuming the same ballpark amount of calories, whether you eat carbohydrates or protein, foods high in fiber or foods high in fat. Going down a couple of pounds probably means that you either let go of some water weight or didn't have a cheat day in a while.

Maybe it's a temporary issue but the calculator you linked doesn't change BMR (nor TDEE) when I play with the "height" dial.

[(Anonymous)]

cool maybe if you don't watch the show you have no idea what they've been eating

they don't even have crops growing yet, most of what they're eating are expired preserves and "processed" junk they're finding in vending machines and trucks