case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-04-02 03:21 pm

[ SECRET POST #3377 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3377 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04. [please don't randomly link other people's secrets ??? ]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 063 secrets from Secret Submission Post #483.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Planting dilemma

(Anonymous) 2016-04-02 10:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Hollyhocks aren't toxic if ingested, but they can cause allergic skin reactions in both pets and children by contact.

Re: Planting dilemma

[personal profile] herpymcderp 2016-04-02 11:31 pm (UTC)(link)
...Ostensibly anything can cause an allergic reaction on contact.

Allergies are very mysterious that way.

Re: Planting dilemma

(Anonymous) 2016-04-03 03:00 am (UTC)(link)
Uh, I guess, but you'd still be smart to be wary of plants that are KNOWN for it. That's the reason why people worry less about contact allergies from shasta daisies than they do from say, stinging nettles or poison ivy.