case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-04-02 03:21 pm

[ SECRET POST #3377 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3377 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04. [please don't randomly link other people's secrets ??? ]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 063 secrets from Secret Submission Post #483.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
chardmonster: (Default)

Re: Why bother defending yourself?

[personal profile] chardmonster 2016-04-03 02:47 am (UTC)(link)
People who hate internet bigots are the REAL bigots

Keep trying pal. Next you'll tell us not to discriminate against people who "don't agree with" homosexuality.
Edited 2016-04-03 02:48 (UTC)

Re: Why bother defending yourself?

(Anonymous) 2016-04-03 02:50 am (UTC)(link)
Huh?
chardmonster: (Default)

Re: Why bother defending yourself?

[personal profile] chardmonster 2016-04-03 03:18 am (UTC)(link)
I'm a little bit tipsy! But: I am totally comfortable embracing stereotypes about idiots who use the term SJW this late. They are dinks.

Re: Why bother defending yourself?

(Anonymous) 2016-04-03 04:24 am (UTC)(link)
...

What I'm saying is that screaming "Breitbart!" is equally as tired and unoriginal. You are a dink by your own logic.
chardmonster: (Default)

Re: Why bother defending yourself?

[personal profile] chardmonster 2016-04-03 04:44 am (UTC)(link)
Nah

I mean I'm making fun of people who go to a particular stupid website

They're accusing people of being "SJWs" for the very controversial act of wanting to see minorities in popular media

Re: Why bother defending yourself?

(Anonymous) 2016-04-03 07:06 pm (UTC)(link)
It's such a tired argument and no bit better than accusing anyone with moderate feminist beliefs to be a rabid Jezebel fanatic but hey, if that's the level you want to argue on that's your problem.
chardmonster: (Default)

Oh no!

[personal profile] chardmonster 2016-04-03 07:10 pm (UTC)(link)
I wouldn't want to hurt the feelings of a jackass who thinks casting black people isn't worthwhile would I?

It isn't their fault they're triggered by the presence of more than one brown person in an hour long television show! They must be protected and coddled.
Edited 2016-04-03 19:10 (UTC)

Re: Oh no!

(Anonymous) 2016-04-03 07:16 pm (UTC)(link)
You basically took the hyperbole of the secret at heart and totally believed that everyone calls OP an SJW for this fancast and now you're just rambling about things that have nothing to do with what I said but hey, have fun making an ass of yourself I guess.
chardmonster: (Default)

Re: Oh no!

[personal profile] chardmonster 2016-04-03 08:10 pm (UTC)(link)
I am sorry I did not take this conversation seriously! Clearly we must maintain decorum when discussing these important matters.