Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-04-03 04:00 pm
[ SECRET POST #3378 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3378 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 053 secrets from Secret Submission Post #483.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
Also, I dunno, if you like action movies - how can you not find it visually amazing? It's basically one giant nerve-wrecking car chase.
I mean, it's okay not to like things. And it has been over-hyped. But I feel like your reasons for not liking it are sort of bizarre.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-03 08:35 pm (UTC)(link)And it was a good enough car chase, but it was just so over the top to the point where I ended up tuning out. That's the weird part, the first movie with the level of realism it had to it kept me much more engaged. This felt more like a spectacle, flashy and dramatic but not really all that interesting. I like it when action tells a story; the only story this was telling was 'add more fire / ha ha cult and stuff' which was... pretty much already established early on. I didn't feel that it did much to develop the characters. I got a lot more out of the scene with the tree and them struggling to start the truck than the actual chases.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-03 08:51 pm (UTC)(link)I also found this film very much not to my taste, and just generally not as good as it had been made out to be. I found the parts that appealed to my feminist sensibilities overly obvious, and the rest was just a big "no thanks."
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-04 01:07 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-03 08:40 pm (UTC)(link)Not about MMFR but arguing in principle: being a lesser evil doesn't make a character automatically personally compelling. Giving it nothing else but that is lazy writing. Plenty of stories, especially action movies, fail in the same way - by assuming the evil is heinous enough so that of course the reader is on the hero's side by default so they don't worry about making the heroes compelling on their own.
See: 90% of 30 y/o white male video game protagonists
no subject
I mean, if OP doesn't connect to them,that's fine, but evil isn't a word I'd use for them.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-03 08:50 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-03 08:46 pm (UTC)(link)Like just taking the 30 y/o white male video game protagonist and making them a woman instead does not make a story inherently more interesting. It's sort of, hey, cool, we went from a relatively flat guy to a relatively flat girl instead. I just feel like Mad Max Fury Road had a lot of wasted potential. Tossing women into things and throwing the ideas of themes around doesn't really mean much when those points aren't engaged with or really developed.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-03 08:52 pm (UTC)(link)THIS. THANK YOU.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-04 01:10 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-04 01:37 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-04 03:57 am (UTC)(link)