case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-04-03 04:00 pm

[ SECRET POST #3378 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3378 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 053 secrets from Secret Submission Post #483.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2016-04-04 01:24 am (UTC)(link)
I can see the appeal, but it also makes me sad to think of not being able to use old favorites in the game.

If it did that, though, I would still buy and play it. As long as they introduced a lot of new Pokemon. Gen V was cool with that and it was ok to not be able to use any old Pokes until post-game because they had so many new ones (and it's one of my favorite gens in terms of new content, too, not just volume-wise but a lot of really cool Pokes cane in).

ETA: additionally, it would also be VERY different to engineer a metagame (and I assume you're talking about the meta here) that didn't end up lopsided somehow. To do that they'd basically have to make several Pokemon statistically identical which would arguably make the meta more boring - and/or totally re-engineer the type compatibility chart, which they already tweaked with but it would take a massive overhaul to make it so there isn't a single dominant type and I don't think that would go over well at all.
Edited 2016-04-04 01:25 (UTC)