[ SECRET POST #3379 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3379 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[FullMetal Alchemist]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Supernatural]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Once Upon a Time]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Happiness!]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Lord of the Rings trilogy]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Marble Hornets/TroyHasACamera]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Wicked Tuna, Dave Carraro]


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 042 secrets from Secret Submission Post #483.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Gaming Ranty Ranty

[feotakahari]

For better or worse, feminists created what Gamergate is today. They pointed out all the assholes in the movement, so the moderates got embarrassed to be a part of it and left. The only folks still involved at this point are the ones too stubborn and self-righteous to give in.

Re: Gaming Ranty Ranty

[blitzwing]

I haven't noticed a big change in Gamergate demographics tbh, but I don't pay all that much attention to it.

They pointed out all the assholes in the movement, so the moderates got embarrassed to be a part of it and left.

I somehow doubt this. Gamergate pointed out assholes in the anti-GG movement, like Sarah Nyberg being a pedophile, among other things, and people haven't abandoned being anti-GG as a result. Why would psychology be different for Gamergaters than for anti-GGers?

"there are assholes in this movement" doesn't bother most people, because they're a member of the in-group, and thus view the in-group as diverse (i.e "of course there are some assholes in our movement!"). It's generally out-groupers that see a few assholes in a group, and generalize that to the whole group and develop disgust for it. Not in-groupers.