case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-04-04 06:51 pm

[ SECRET POST #3379 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3379 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[FullMetal Alchemist]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Supernatural]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Once Upon a Time]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Happiness!]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Lord of the Rings trilogy]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Marble Hornets/TroyHasACamera]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Wicked Tuna, Dave Carraro]


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 042 secrets from Secret Submission Post #483.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
blitzwing: ([magi] drakon)

Re: Gaming Ranty Ranty

[personal profile] blitzwing 2016-04-05 12:48 am (UTC)(link)
But would you have bothered to give ARYT a response if they weren't (most likely) an out-group for you?

I'm more likely to give that response to an in-group in defense of an out-group I don't belong to.

It's more effective at challenging out-group bias IMO, to point out to *your* own group that all groups are diverse and made of many types of people. Because if you defend your own in-group as diverse "we're not all like that" to an out-group you just get scoffed at.

Sometimes people in your own group will listen to you call out out-group bias. People that view you as "enemy" are much less likely to be open to that dialogue coming from their "enemy".