[ SECRET POST #3382 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3382 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 093 secrets from Secret Submission Post #483.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Scientific misconduct and sexual harassment: article

[feotakahari]

Interesting article about how the dynamics of reporting sexual harassment in science parallel the dynamics of reporting plagiarism and data manipulation. For instance, in both cases the whistleblower is typically a student or assistant to a researcher who has much more clout and backing than them, and in both cases the whistleblower may be blamed for the very act they're reporting. It goes on to compare Callisto, a website for reporting sexual harassers on college campuses, to Pubpeer, which reports plagiarism and data manipulation.

http://retractionwatch.com/2016/04/06/scientific-misconduct-and-sexual-harassment-similar-problems-with-similar-solutions